Plot a route
Pick where you are now and where you want to get to. Atlas draws a realistic route, lets you optimise it for time, cost or coding, and explains what each step actually asks of you.
Optimise for
Your next step
IT Support → Sysadmin
Prepare evidence for this move first.
- A recurring problem you removed rather than reprocessed
- Documentation you wrote that someone else used
A lab can show learning, not production ownership. Label examples honestly and keep confidential information out.
Build my Route BriefFree, no account. Continue with these roles already selected.
IT Support to Cloud Engineer is a load-bearing route. The plotted line is roughly what real careers in this lane look like.
- Reachability
- Common
- Timeline
- ~3–7 years · +£33k · 2 hops
The route holds together. TechWaymark flags IT Support to Sysadmin as the transition to examine most closely; build evidence for that move.
You inherit the change window. Outages are yours now, not someone else's escalation.
Load-bearing transitions, realistic pacing, grounded endpoint. This is what the route looks like when it works.
Of the hops on this route, TechWaymark rates this one weakest (documented). That makes it the likeliest place for a plan to stall, and it is a judgement about the transition, not a measured failure rate. The cost is named as Biggest risk above.
Salary and time figures are TechWaymark practitioner estimates, not survey data.
- BottleneckIT Support↓ SysadminCommonly paired
Most sysadmins pass through support; the leap is autonomy, not skills.
~1–2y on step·+£13k·documented - Common hopSysadmin↓ Cloud EngineerAdjacent pivot
Systems experience can transfer into cloud operations, but the remaining automation and platform gaps vary by role.
TradeoffOn-prem muscle memory stops paying. You're back to being the junior in the room on IAM, networking primitives and IaC.
~2–5y on step·+£20k·common
What the labels on this route mean
- Commonly paired
- These two roles regularly appear in the same career histories. Not a promotion, more an autonomy/accountability step.
- Pacing: documented
- TechWaymark rates this real but not the default: it turns up in career histories without being the obvious next move.
- Adjacent pivot
- Cross-domain move documented in real careers. Senior in your old lane, mid-level in the new one for a year or so.
- Pacing: common
- TechWaymark rates this a load-bearing transition: the move the rest of the route is built around. A judgement about the transition, not a measured rate.
Most of the calendar time on this route sits here. If you're impatient, this is the step to question.
The full interactive map is easier to explore on a larger screen.
Of the hops on this route, TechWaymark rates this one weakest (documented). That makes it the likeliest place for a plan to stall, and it is a judgement about the transition, not a measured failure rate. The cost is named as Biggest risk above.
Load-bearing transitions people actually make. Pacing is realistic, not aspirational.
Authored steps carry TechWaymark's own written rationale. Inferred steps are derived from the shape of the graph alone and deserve stronger scrutiny before you plan around them. Salary and time figures are TechWaymark practitioner estimates, not survey data.
- 1IT SupportSysadminCommonly paired
Most sysadmins pass through support; the leap is autonomy, not skills.
~1–2y on step·+£13k·documented - 2SysadminCloud EngineerAdjacent pivot
Systems experience can transfer into cloud operations, but the remaining automation and platform gaps vary by role.
TradeoffOn-prem muscle memory stops paying. You're back to being the junior in the room on IAM, networking primitives and IaC.
~2–5y on step·+£20k·common
What the labels on this route mean
- Common route
- How trustworthy this route is, not just whether it exists. Common means load-bearing. Stretch means possible but slow or org-dependent. Compressed means Fewest steps mode has skipped realistic dwell. Rare means an uncommon hop plus an aspirational endpoint.
- Commonly paired
- These two roles regularly appear in the same career histories. Not a promotion, more an autonomy/accountability step.
- Pacing: documented
- TechWaymark rates this real but not the default: it turns up in career histories without being the obvious next move.
- Adjacent pivot
- Cross-domain move documented in real careers. Senior in your old lane, mid-level in the new one for a year or so.
- Pacing: common
- TechWaymark rates this a load-bearing transition: the move the rest of the route is built around. A judgement about the transition, not a measured rate.
The next step
You have the route. Now judge whether it holds up for you.
The free route shows what tends to happen. The Career Verdict tests that route against your experience, time and constraints.
A route shows what is possible. A Career Verdict makes the call.
Career Verdict
Helpdesk → Security Architect
- 01The callA clear judgement on whether your route is realistic, and under what conditions.
- 02Where the route breaksThe most likely point to stall, and why it happens in practice.
- 03What to do nextSpecific priorities for the next 6–24 months, and what to drop.
Career Verdict
- The callA single written judgement on whether the route is realistic for you.
- Plateaus and failure modesThe flat years and the specific ways this route tends to stall.
- Where you standThe strongest and weakest parts of your current position, named.
- Salary realityWhat this route actually pays, set against what you've been told it pays.
Usually within minutes of payment. Kept 24 months, then deleted. Deletion on request at any time.
Built on TechWaymark's practitioner-authored assessment framework, informed by two decades across helpdesk, infrastructure and security. The verdict applies that framework to your inputs.